November 13, 2005
Savage Rapids removal funds in budget
By MARK FREEMAN
Mail Tribune
Congress is poised to deliver enough federal money to begin construction next spring of a water-pumping station set to
replace the aged Savage Rapids Dam in the Rogue River.
Despite budget cuts and competition for money in Hurricane Katrinas wake, the 2006 federal budget has $1.5
million for keeping the timeline for removing the 83-year-old dam and replacing it with electric pumps to feed Grants
Pass Irrigation District customers.
The money is in the Energy and Water Appropriations Bill that came out of a joint House of Representatives and U.S.
Senate committee last week. It has yet to be signed into law.
The money will go to the federal Bureau of Reclamation, which is almost done with the pumping station design and could go
out for bids on the $15 million pumping plant as early as late winter.
Bob Hamilton, the bureaus manager for the Savage Rapids Dam project, said the plan is to first construct the water
intake for the plant, which will pump and pipe water to GPIDs more than 7,000 patrons on both sides of the
river.
GPID and dam-removal advocates collectively sighed with relief when word of the bills money reached Southern
Oregon.
"This is good news," said Bob Hunter, staff attorney for WaterWatch of Oregon, which has lobbied for years for
removing the dam spanning the Rogue near the Jackson-Josephine county border. "This keeps the project front and
center and moving on."
Plans are to seek about $15 million in the 2007 budget for building the pumping station and necessary piping, Hunter
said. Congress would then be asked for about $3 million for dam-removal out of the 2008 budget, Hunter said.
Removing the dam is estimated to cost about $6 million, and the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board previously gave
$3 million for it.
Hunter and GPID Manager Dave Howard thanked Oregons congressional delegation for keeping the project alive.
Removing the dam and installing the pumps provides a long-term solution to the current dams fish-passage problems
while keeping GPID in the irrigation business.
A U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service study concluded the dam severely reduces the Rogue's ability to grow wild salmon and
steelhead.
The bureau recently completed an environmental study that backed a 1995 conclusion that dam removal was the best and
cheapest alternative for solving the dam's fish-passage and water-delivery issues.
The bureaus design also calls for a single large pumping station along the river's south bank. A large electronic
substation would be built to carry the power necessary to run the nine pumps within the enclosed station.
The design includes sending water to patrons on the north side of the river through a 30-inch pipe suspended above the
Rogue River atop remnants of the old dam. The design has been panned in the Rogue River community as a potential
eyesore.
A consent decree the district signed under a federal judge's watchful eye in 2001 dictates that the dam will no longer be
used to help deliver irrigation water after 2006. The district has since received a one-year extension, so the timeline
in the environmental assessment matches the decree.
Reach reporter Mark Freeman at 776-4470, or e-mail
mfreeman@mailtribune.com.